Cases 11 - 20 of 263
Moyler v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Thomas Moyler and Shiek Thomas Moyler-Bey
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, D. Anderson, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custis v. Accomack County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Accomack County Sheriff's Office, Wayne Greer, Donnie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Dodson et al
as 1:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bradford
Defendant:
Dodson, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Layton v. Carter et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Defendant:
Carter, LPN Reiner and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
William Layton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Davis et al
as 7:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Holman et al
as 7:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Daquan Saunders
Defendant:
D.R. Holman, M. Ewing, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
