Cases 11 - 20 of 30
WILLIAMS v. KANE et al
as 3:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
KELVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THOMAS R. KANE , M. ROBINOWITZ , J. CHEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL et al
as 2:2017cv04158
Plaintiff:
AUDRETTE LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, VICTORIA GESSNER, ALYNN ZERNHELT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rainey v. Spaulding et al
as 4:2016cv02288
Petitioner:
Joseph L. Rainey
Respondent:
Spaulding and Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv01611
Plaintiff:
Glenn E. Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe,, Jane Doe/John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSER v. WIDENOUR et al
as 2:2016cv01039
Defendant:
WETZEL, DR. JIN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
HOUSER and DARIEN HOUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Spigelman v. Oddo et al
as 3:2016cv00848
Petitioner:
Joel Spigelman
Respondent:
Oddo, United States Bureau of Prisons and Jane or John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TABANSI v. CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv00246
Plaintiff:
SEHU-KESSA SAA TABANSI
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC., CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, INC. ON SITE REPRESENTATIVE JANE DOE/JOHN DOE, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT LISA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tensley v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2015cv01425
Petitioner:
Darian Renard Tensley
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons , U.S.P. Allenwood , Oddo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dillard v. United States Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 3:2015cv01016
Petitioner:
Dennis J Dillard
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, USP - Allenwood and Jane and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bright v. D.C. Board of Parole et al
as 3:2015cv00181
Petitioner:
Joseph S. Bright
Respondent:
D.C. Board of Parole , Jane and John Doe and USP Allenwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
