Cases 11 - 20 of 88
McArdle v. Leu
as 3:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McArdle
Defendant:
Warden David Leu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Stafford County Sheriff Dep., et al.
as 1:2023cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Peters
Defendant:
Stafford County Sheriff Dep. and Fredericksburg Sheriffs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Mesmer et al
as 2:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Peters
Defendant:
Cpl. Mesmer, Sgt. Jacobs, Cpl. Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Deane et al
as 1:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Peters
Defendant:
CCM Deane, Mr. Mackey and Ms. Victory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. White et al
as 7:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
R. White, Blevins, C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schmaltz v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01107
Petitioner:
Jeremy Jonathan Schmaltz
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Thomas F. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lewis v. Streeval
as 7:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Jeremy E. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Farabee v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Brian Damon Farabee
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Angela N. Torres, Angela Harvell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00415
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
G. Walker, Buckingham Correctional Center Warden, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smallwood v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2022cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smallwood
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lt. Steele, Cpl. Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
