Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Gonzalez v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Hilaro Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Wirtz, Jr. v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00545
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Wirtz, Jr
Respondent:
Kevin Stitt and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Powell v. Farris
as 22-6067
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL MAX POWELL
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden
Wirtz, Jr. v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Wirtz, Jr.
Respondent:
Kevin Stitt and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Small v. Farris
as 6:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Vincent H. Small
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma and Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nolen v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00272
Petitioner:
Alton Nolen
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Tafolla v. Farris
as 4:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Jestin Tafolla and Bebo
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bench v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Miles Sterling Bench
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
