Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Padilla v. Ruck et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jose R Padilla
Defendant:
Donald Ruck , Jeneifer Wollert, Barbra Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla-Vazquez v. USA
as 3:2014cv00074
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Padilla-Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jose Padilla v. United States Government, et al
as 13-15878
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE U. PADILLA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Jose Padilla, Jr. v. U.S. Government, et al
as 13-15201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE ULYSSES PADILLA, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Padilla v. United States Government et al
as 3:2012cv05984
Petitioner:
Jose U. Padilla
Respondent:
United States Government, F.B.I. and D.E.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Padilla v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2012cv05622
Plaintiff:
Jose Ulysses Padilla, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Government, DEA, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. United States Government
as 3:2012cv05117
Petitioner:
Jose Ulysses Padilla, Jr.
Respondent:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Padilla v. Gary Maier, et al
as 12-2737
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE R. PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY J. MAIER, DALIA SULIENE, KURT SCHWEBKE and others
Padilla, Jose v. Maier, Gary et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Padilla
Defendant:
Gary Maier , Dalia Suliene and Bittleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla, Jose et al v. Grams, Gregory et al
as 3:2011cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jose R. Padilla and Natanael Rivera
Defendant:
Gregory Grams , Kurt Schwebke , Jerry Maier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
