Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 110
Cabrera v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv10823
Petitioner: Arnaldo Cabrera
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Grondolsky
as 1:2016cv10696
Petitioner: Curtis Holmes
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sergentakis v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2016cv10313
Respondent: FMC-Devens and Jeff Grondolsky
Petitioner: Kris Sergentakis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patela v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv13337
Petitioner: Victor Patela
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv12805
Plaintiff: AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jeff Grondolsky, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AL-HAJ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv00070
Plaintiff: AHMED MOHAMMED AL-HAJ
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JEFF GRONDOLSKY, CLINICAL DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv14270
Petitioner: Kyle Richard Pratt
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2014cv13821
Plaintiff: Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant: Jeff Grondolsky, S. Brown, K. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bultmeyer v. Grondolsky
as 4:2014cv40109
Petitioner: Paul G. Bultmeyer
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hankinson v. Grondolsky We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv11702
Petitioner: Daniel Hankinson
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?