Cases 11 - 20 of 366
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05990
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ray Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Chad M Enright and Allyson Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. King County
as 2:2022cv01612
Plaintiff:
Jack Jeffrey Carter
Defendant:
King County and King County Jail Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKee v. Uttecht et al
as 4:2022cv05123
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwight McKee
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht, Kristen Williams, Does 01 - Incident Commander CRCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abrams v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2022cv05714
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Abrams
Defendant:
Jeffrey Shaffer, Monica Capps and Dawn Michelle Fleetwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Neau et al
as 4:2022cv05120
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Defendant:
Jonathan Neau, Timothy J Taylor, Kenneth G Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Phenix
as 3:2022cv05670
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Payne
Respondent:
Amy Phenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giblin v. Hayes
as 3:2022cv05599
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Paul Giblin
Respondent:
Ronald Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tyree Brown
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Stephen Sinclair, Scott Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Immett et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffrey Immett, Doug McMillon and John Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
