Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Pitts v. John Does
as 5:2022cv05014
Plaintiff:
Cora Lee Pitts
Defendant:
John Does 1 & 2, John Doe 1, Chief of Police John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06011
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crow v. Ball et al
as 6:2022cv06010
Plaintiff:
Barry Wayne Crow
Defendant:
Richard Todd Ball and John Does 1-200
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Miller County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2021cv04046
Plaintiff:
LaShundra Bradley
Defendant:
Miller County, Arkansas, City of Texarkana, Arkansas, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tackett v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06057
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Tackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schrader v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06063
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Schrader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burdue v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06060
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Burdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dion v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06061
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Dion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boring v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06062
Plaintiff:
David Boring and David Baring
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06058
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
David Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
