Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Ashfield v. Schuylkill County et al
as 1:2022cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jason Ashfield
Defendant:
Schuylkill County, Schuylkill County Prison, Schuylkill County Prison Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. McCauley et al
as 1:2022cv00712
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Lee
Defendant:
Lt. C. McCauley, John Doe # 1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stroud v. USP-Lewisburg et al
as 1:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stroud
Defendant:
Warden of USP-Lewisburg, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MEDINA v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
MARIO MEDINA
Defendant:
OFFICER JONES, SERGEANT WINGER, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Garcia v. Rockovich et al
as 3:2021cv02160
Plaintiff:
Edwin Garcia
Defendant:
Mark Rockovich, John Doe 1, Mark McAndrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Picarella v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv01440
Defendant:
John Doe 7, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Robert Williamson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Picarella
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSE v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2020cv02683
Defendant:
SRGT MCGONIGLE, JOHN DOE #5, GABRIEL PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Good v. DOE et al
as 1:2020cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alan Good
Defendant:
John DOE, John Doe (5), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
