Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Airy v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Charles D Airy
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Roderick Q. Hickman, John Dovey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jewell v. Francis et al
as 3:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jewell
Defendant:
Steve Francis, John Dovey, George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexandre v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 4:2009cv05778
Plaintiff:
Loran Micha Alexandre
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger , James Tilton , Dennis Kenneally and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Blach v. John Dovey, et al
as 09-17571
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY BLACH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DOVEY, Director for Adult Institutions, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and SCOTT KERNAN, Director of Adult Institutions, California Department of Corrections
John Balbo v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-17507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL BALBO
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, JOHN DOVEY and ROBERT SILLEN
Fernando Aranda v. John Dovey, et al
as 09-16325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FERNANDO ARANDA
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DOVEY and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Attorney General of the State of California
Hayes v. Dovey et al
as 3:2009cv01016
Plaintiff:
Dontay D Hayes
Defendant:
John Dovey, Jeanne Woodford, J G Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Dovey et al
as 2:2009cv01199
Plaintiff:
Delvon Morgan
Defendant:
John Dovey, M Evans and N. Grannis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bismarck Martinez v. John Dovey
as 09-55555
Petitioner - Appellant:
BISMARCK LOPEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DOVEY, Director of Corrections
Willis v. Dovey et al
as 3:2009cv00814
Plaintiff:
Marcell Willis
Defendant:
John Dovey and M. C. Kramer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
