Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Peters v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City)
as 0:2015cv04083
Plaintiff:
Jameel Antonio Peters
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City), Thomas Roy , The Deputy Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbertson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Roger Michael Gilbertson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services , Kevin Moser , Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teegarden v. Roy et al
as 0:2012cv02190
Plaintiff:
Aaron Teegarden
Defendant:
Tom Roy, Joan Fabian, Andy Lieffort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00881
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teegarden v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2012cv00836
Plaintiff:
Aaron Teegarden
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Minnesota Correctional Facility Stillwater, Minnesota Correctional Facility Oak Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00593
Plaintiff:
Brandy Owen Lewis
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Karl Godfrey Stevens
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00441
Plaintiff:
James Robinson Poole
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hajek v. Dayton et al
as 0:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Joseph Allen Hajek
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Dayton et al
as 0:2011cv03702
Plaintiff:
Ryan J. White
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lori Swanson, Cal Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
