Cases 11 - 20 of 5,698
Misbah Kazi v. John Doe et al
as 2:2024cv04617
Plaintiff:
Misbah Kazi
Defendant:
John Doe and V. Hetrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fratus v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv03261
Plaintiff:
John Fratus
Defendant:
Deputy Washington and Ofr. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arguello v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Israel Arguello
Defendant:
John Doe and J. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeffrey Macomber, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fernando Miguel De Oliveira v. CDCR-California Institution for Women et al
as 5:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miquel De Oliveira
Defendant:
CDCR-California Institution for Women, L. Parker, Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. Andes
as 3:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
John B. Gomez
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Valdivia v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
John Valdivia
Defendant:
Miriam Vasquez and Department of State Hospitals Coalinga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Defendant:
A. Silva and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald J. Wilson v. C. Geinito et al
as 2:2024cv04104
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Wilson
Defendant:
Corrections Officers C. Geinito and Health Care Provider John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
