Cases 11 - 20 of 270
Lang v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
James Ellis Lang
Respondent:
Ladeidra N. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Jones
Defendant:
Warden Gilley, J. Hutson, Larry Monhollen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jones v. Warren County Regional Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Henry Earl Jones
Defendant:
Warren County Regional Jail, Stephen Harman, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. LeMaster
as 0:2023cv00083
Petitioner:
Ronald VanDoren Jones
Respondent:
David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bradley v. Gomez et al
as 6:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Bradley, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gomez, Brandon Perry, Patti Ann Land and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. USA
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Kenneth L. Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reed v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Tony Reed
Respondent:
USP McCreary, Dr. Parsons, Dr. R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazer v. Mullins, RN et al
as 5:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
John J. Frazer
Defendant:
P Mullins, RN, Amanda Miller, Crystal Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Correct-Care Solutions, et al. et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Correct-Care Solutions, et al., Wellpath, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Clay County, Ky et al
as 6:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Patrick Robinson, Bill Warran, Jerrod Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
