Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Bailey v. Forostiak et al
as 3:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Stephen Forostiak, Harley G. Lappin, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kareem Millhouse v. Mark Peoria, et al
as 10-4724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK PEORIA, K REAR and B. A. BLEDSOE
Johnny Chandler v. Fed Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-4628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHNNY RAY CHANDLER
Defendant - Appellee:
FED BUREAU OF PRISONS, SASSAMAN, Lt. and K REAR, Associate Warden
Brown v. Edinger et al
as 3:2010cv02471
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
M. Edinger, R. Ramp, Mr. Carasquilo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv02146
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Sassaman and K Rear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daley v. Lappin et al
as 1:2010cv02060
Plaintiff:
Dameon Daley
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, B. A. Bledsoe, K. Rear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Brown v. Hepner et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
J. Hepner, M Edinger, Ivan Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY et al v. AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2010cv01833
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER JOCKERY and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, HARELY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Rodarmel et al
as 3:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
Matt Rodarmel, Tyrone Wallace, E Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
