Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Winn v. Nyzc et al
as 1:2017cv01282
Plaintiff:
Antoine Winn
Defendant:
Matthew Nyzc, Gary Bartell, John L. Vinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Cool et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Terry Tyrone Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
William Cool, Cynthia Davis, David Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Kasich et al
as 2:2015cv02043
Plaintiff:
Daniel P McKinney
Defendant:
John R. Kasich, Gary Mohr, Gary Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Lawson et al
as 1:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Charles Chapman
Defendant:
Steven Lawson, Agents of Regional Narcotics Unit and Organized Crime Divison, Mark Tiereny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pugh et al
as 4:2013cv00238
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
M. Pugh, United States Marshal, Pam Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawson v. USA
as 4:2013cv00030
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Linnard O. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Smith v. Lawson
as 1:2012cv00924
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Lawson, II
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Smith, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2012cv00243
Petitioner:
Sylvester J. Lawson, II
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2011cv00183
Petitioner:
James Harold Lawson
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
