Cases 11 - 20 of 154
Rice et al v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Rice, Achilles D. Johnson and Jason L. Mitchell
Defendant:
Mike Lewis and Brandon Lampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. White et al
as 6:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Couch
Defendant:
Joseph White, Henrietta Bailey-Lewis, Allen B. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. LeMasters et al
as 7:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
Arron Michael Lewis
Respondent:
Warden LeMasters and Warden Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Lewis
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark and Greg Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cline v. Allen et al
as 4:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Terry Lewis Cline
Defendant:
Mike Allen and City of Beaver Dam, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Workman v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Easley Workman, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Chandler, Patrick Snyder, Trent Fannin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosby v. Lewis
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deomineke Mosby
Defendant:
Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Lance Christopher White
Defendant:
Mike Lewis, Sergeant Brandon Lampton, Janet Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Hopkins Co. Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Andrew Randolph
Defendant:
Hopkins Co. Jail and Jailer Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Joyner
as 7:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Jamal Antwan Lewis
Respondent:
USA and Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
