Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 89
ALLEN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff: LAWSON ALLEN
Defendant: LANE and WEISINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner: BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent: CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDEN-FIELDS v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01382
Plaintiff: NICKI GOLDEN-FIELDS
Defendant: CHRIS LANE and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COMBS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff: DEAN COMBS
Defendant: CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv01761
Plaintiff: MICHAEL V. LANE
Defendant: ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DR. DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHINNEMAN v. INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02203
Plaintiff: TRAVIS SHINNEMAN
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY CITY-COUNTY COUNCIL, JOE HOGSETT, VOP OSILI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00761
Defendant: LAURA BODKIN, DUSHAN ZATECKY, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES WAYNE ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. ROHANA et al
as 2:2020cv00650
Defendant: ROHANA and KERRY J. FORESTAL
Plaintiff: JASON L. LANG and JASON L. LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE et al v. MILLER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01697
Plaintiff: S. QADIR, M. LANE and M. AION
Defendant: B. MILLER, ARAMARK CORPORATION and A. COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COY v. GRAY et al
as 4:2020cv00072
Plaintiff: BRAIDAN C. COY
Defendant: SUSAN ORTH, CHRISTOPHER BLAKE LANE, JUSTIN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?