Cases 11 - 20 of 155
DICKSON v. Lane et al
as 2:2020cv02368
Defendant:
Lieutenant M. Lane, Correctional Officer Anthony, Correctional Officer Camona and others
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC DICKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RA-BEY v. LANE et al
as 2:2020cv00648
Defendant:
TIMIKA LANE and EARL D. RAYNOR, JR.
Plaintiff:
TETI AMUN RA-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARMON v. LANE et al
as 5:2019cv06113
Petitioner:
SHALAMAR CARMON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and J. LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALKER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv06108
Defendant:
K. WADAS, COMMONWEALTH OF PHILADELPHIA, L. MANDELL and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUOR WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv01789
Defendant:
Warden Lane, Lt. O'Connor, Chaplain Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. WOLF et al
as 2:2019cv04582
Petitioner:
DOREL JENKINS and DARRELL ANTHONY JENKINS
Respondent:
JUDGE TIMIKA LANE, JUDGE JACQUELYN FRAZIER LYDE, WARDEN JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HEAD v. CARR et al
as 2:2019cv01246
Defendant:
STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR., MICHAEL D. ANDERSON, CHARLES R. CARR, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLASSEN v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2019cv03864
Respondent:
JUDGE TIMIKA LANE, JOHN DELANEY, D.A. LARRY KRASNER and others
Petitioner:
JOSE M. CLASSEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAYTON v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00822
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, DR. LANE C. DEFRANCISO, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CLARK v. DOE-HERNANDEZ et al
as 2:2019cv02531
Defendant:
NURSE ASHLEY HARRINGTON, NURSE JOHN DOE, CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
