Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOPER v. DEPT. OF CORRECTION STAFF et al
as 2:2016cv02628
Plaintiff:
BRAXTON COOPER
Defendant:
DEPT. OF CORRECTION STAFF, CONNIE GREENE, TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. State Officers
as 3:2015cv01829
Plaintiff:
Julio Christian
Defendant:
State Officers, Police Officers, Former District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2013cv07422
Petitioner:
DWIGHT WATSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, LYNN ABRAHAM and MIKE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSARIO v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2013cv01945
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROSARIO
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, JOHN DOYLE, EDWARD MCCANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Chavis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 13-1556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
CHAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv05642
Plaintiff:
RONALD CHAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NUTTER, SETH WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sollog Adonai-Adoni v. Leon King, II, et al
as 12-3605
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLLOG IMMANUEL ADONAI-ADONI
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON KING, II, OSEI BUTLER, TABITA and others
Bobby Williamson v. US Embassy, et al
as 11-4072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
US EMBASSY, London Chapter (John Doe), JOSEPH AIELLO, KEITH HARMON and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LOCKEY DALEY
WILLIAMSON v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY et al
as 2:2011cv04966
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY, JOHN DOE, JOSEPH AIELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
