Cases 11 - 20 of 186
Weston v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Weston
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, James Dzurenda, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazard v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Dennis Hazard
Defendant:
Semple, J. Dzurenda, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Davis
Defendant:
Scott Semple, James Dzurenda, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Andres Carroll
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Carol Chapdelaine, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Edward Maldonado, Carol Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nester Maldonado
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry H. Brown
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kevin Roy and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonvie v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bonvie
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
