Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Victor Soto v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-50890
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL SOTO
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Soto v. Stephens
as 1:2016cv00589
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and William Stephens
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto Del Angel v. USA
as 6:2014cv00017
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Soto Del Angel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SOTO v. CAMERON et al
as 5:2014cv01331
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
KEN CAMERON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOTO v. PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2013cv04258
Petitioner:
HECTOR MANUEL SOTO, JR.
Respondent:
PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRENDALEE TRITT, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. Kerestes
as 1:2013cv01916
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Soto, Jr.
Defendant:
John Kerestes
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soto v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Petitioner:
Hector Manuel Soto, Jr.
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General, Brendalee Tritt, John E. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Manuel Soto-Riva
as 11-10507
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MANUEL SOTO-RIVAS
Soto v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00171
Petitioner:
Manuel Soto
Respondent:
David Justice, Director of BOP, Director of ICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Soto-Rivas v. USA
as 6:2008cv00027
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Manuel Soto-Rivas
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
