Cases 11 - 20 of 499
Martinez v. Birkholz
as 2:2023cv02068
Petitioner:
Joshua Michael Martinez
Respondent:
B Birkholz and J Monarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Quintana v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01658
Plaintiff:
Anita Martinez-Quintana
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Briana Robles Martinez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Clint Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Mesa Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Derek Claude Watkins
Defendant:
Mesa Police Department, N Emry, M Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentini v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Christopher Josefowicz, Unknown Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08348
Plaintiff:
Joe P Martinez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08337
Plaintiff:
Fernando Martinez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08340
Plaintiff:
Samuel Martinez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08344
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Martinez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01240
Petitioner:
Joe Paul Martinez
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
