Cases 11 - 20 of 253
Wood v. King
as 2:2023cv12674
Petitioner:
Matthew Jay Wood, I
Respondent:
Michigan Department of Corrections and Chris King
Brown #271566 v. Cioffi et al
as 1:2023cv00987
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Brown II #271566 and Phillip A. Brown #271566, II
Defendant:
Todd Cioffi, Kary Bosma, Calvin Prison Initiative, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batie #813603 v. Washington et al
as 1:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Jermell LaTroy Batie #813603
Defendant:
Heidi E. Washington, Matthew Macauley, R. Brokaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schoening #496406 v. Molloy et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Clifford Anthony Schoening #496405
Defendant:
Rachel Molloy, Unknown Part(y)(ies), Heidi Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Passarelli #954240 v. Gibbons et al
as 1:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee Passarelli #954240
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies), Tracey Gibbons, Dale J. Hilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Squalls v. MaCauley
as 4:2023cv11541
Petitioner:
Davonte Marquis Squalls
Respondent:
Matthew MaCauley
Moore v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv11298
Plaintiff:
Charles Moore
Defendant:
Tavon Brown, Reynolds, Matthews and others
Myles #439074 v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kennith Myles #439074
Defendant:
Unknown Carr, Unknown Miller, Matt Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #367619 v. Atearn et al
as 1:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Alrelio Evans #367619
Defendant:
J. Atearn, Matthew Macauley, R. Browkaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbeil v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Clinton Matthew Corbeil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
