Cases 11 - 20 of 194
AGANAN et al v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2023cv21410
Plaintiff:
RIZZA JANE GUANAO AGANAN, ALBERT BOAMPONG, HECTOR GARCIA MENDOZA and others
Defendant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ, JOHN TSOUKARIS, MATTHEW ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TAYLOR v. LEITH et al
as 1:2023cv20649
Plaintiff:
BRYANT D. TAYLOR
Defendant:
MATTHEW LEITH, LES PASCHALL, DORIS YAA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2023cv17721
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEPHENS v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv09889
Petitioner:
MATTHEW A. STEPHENS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MATTHEWS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv06105
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLAZEWSKI v. MURPHY et al
as 2:2023cv03948
Plaintiff:
VINCENT W. GLAZEWSKI
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POTTS v. CORANDAN et al
as 1:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
STEPHONE POTTS
Defendant:
C.O. CORANDAN, KIANNA SEALY, MATTHEW LEITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv03148
Petitioner:
DONALD THOMAS and DONALD M. THOMAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW J. PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
ALVARADO v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv01192
Petitioner:
JORGE ALVARADO
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, WARDEN and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
