Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Beeler v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00130
Petitioner:
Matthew Beeler
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayden v. Searles et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
Mr. Shelby Searles and Matthew Briske, SGT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
C.J. v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
C. J.
Defendant:
David Jones, Matthew Currence and Robert Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.D. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
A. D.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, David Jones, Matthew Currence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
D.W. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
D. W.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K. S. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.M. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
A. M.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.T. v. Demetro et al
as 2:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
C. T.
Defendant:
Anthony Demetro, Matthew Currence and West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffers v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Matthew Jeffers
Defendant:
Administrator Carl Aldridge, C.O. Lloyd Irwin, C.O. Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
