Cases 11 - 20 of 460
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Dotson et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
E. Dotson, T. Ross, S. Newcomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Medina v. Campbell
as 1:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Cesario Vizcarra Medina
Respondent:
Tammy Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mauricio Martinez Medina v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2022cv08804
Petitioner:
Mauricio Martinez Medina
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Medina v. Amador Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02136
Plaintiff:
Antonio Medina
Defendant:
Amador Jail and Jeremy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) King v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Larry Louis King
Defendant:
K. Clark, M. A. Mason, J. Acevedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 2:2022at01131
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lamon v. McTaggart et al
as 1:2022cv01421
Plaintiff:
Barry Louis Lamon
Defendant:
K. McTaggart, D. Laughlin, J. Filippello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Mancillas Medina v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01735
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Mancillas Medina
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Seymour v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Aaron D. Seymour
Defendant:
Doe 1, Medina, Gallardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
