Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Downs v. Reed
as 4:2022cv00288
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bates v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kelly Joe Bates
Defendant:
Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Chief Deputy, L.E. Mike Reed, Chief Deputy Codey Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Reed
as 6:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00221
Petitioner:
Edward S Downs
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Muskogee County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Reed
as 4:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Edward Scott Downs
Respondent:
Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelby v. Rowe, et al
as 5:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Shelby, Jr and Andrew Jimenez
Defendant:
Lubbock County, Sheriff Kelly S Rowe, Chief Deputy Le Mike Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera v. Rowe et al
as 5:2021cv00184
Plaintiff:
Pimenio Vela Herrera
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe, Mike Reed, Cody Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyles v. Lubbock County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Omar O'Shea Kyles
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Juan Madrid, Lubbock County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepard v. Reed et al
as 4:2017cv00544
Plaintiff:
Billy Shepard, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Reed, Mitch Goodman, Mayes County Jail Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Ballard et al
as 4:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Richard Alan Turner
Defendant:
Matthew J Ballard, Mike Reed, Mitch Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
