Cases 11 - 20 of 30
MILTON-EL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv03226
Petitioner:
CLEATUS MILTON-EL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. 61 PA. STAT. § 331.21 (1941)
as 2:2017cv04534
Plaintiff:
MILTON JOHNSON
Defendant:
61 PA. STAT. 331.21 (1941)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KULB v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04897
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KULB
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MILTON GIBBS, TERRANCE BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHABAZZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03478
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MILTON SHABAZZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILTON v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv02673
Plaintiff:
GREGORY A. MILTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS, Charles E. Samuels, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VALES v. USA
as 2:2013cv01082
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY MILTON VALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HAGGINS v. HARRY et al
as 2:2013cv03027
Petitioner:
MILTON HAGGINS
Respondent:
LAUREL HARRY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAHAM v. MARCELLINO et al
as 2:2013cv02785
Petitioner:
SHAROD T. GRAHAM
Respondent:
PETER F. MARCELLINO, GAIL FAIRMAN, MILTON BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv01337
Plaintiff:
MILTON BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saula-Rivera v. Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon et al
as 4:2013cv00576
Petitioner:
Milton Humberto Saula-Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI Huntingdon and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
