Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Holmes v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv01635
Plaintiff:
Marlon T. Holmes
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Mike Morrow and Brian Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Keen, Michelle Weller, Flood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Keen et al
as 1:2013cv00964
Plaintiff:
Marlon T. Holmes
Defendant:
Daniel S. Keen, Mike Morrow, Brian Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Spence et al
as 3:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Spence, Franklin County Jail, K Shay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Keen et al
as 3:2013cv00614
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Keen, Weller, State of Franklin County PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Hull et al
as 3:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Mike Hull, John Powilson and Applegate Inc. and Owner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Lauren Sulcove, Franklin County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Hull et al
as 3:2013cv00309
Plaintiff:
John Boyd Morrow
Defendant:
Mike Hull, John Powilson and Applegate Inc. and Owner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRACEY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
COREY BRACEY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARLOW, HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Schuylkill County Prison et al
as 3:2007cv01008
Plaintiff:
Frederick Morrow
Defendant:
Schuylkill County Prison, Scott Rizzardi, Mike Flannery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
