Cases 11 - 20 of 20
ALLAH v. REILLY et al
as 2:2015cv03780
Defendant:
JOHN REILLY, NATALIE SMITH, R. LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MALIK ALLAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv00085
Petitioner:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ZANE DAVID MEMEGER and JESSICA NATALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MUCCI v. TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY et al
as 2:2014cv05215
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI MUCCI
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF UPPER DARBY, MICHAEL TAYLOR, STEPHEN ORSKOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. PRIME CARE INC. et al
as 5:2014cv03723
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LUIS ROMAN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE INC., SWEENEY, WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2014cv03406
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL BELL
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, DAVE BRYNE, NATALIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAPETILLO v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 5:2014cv02715
Plaintiff:
IVAN CAPETILLO, JR.
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. , LEHIGH COUNTY PRISON, EDWARD SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARRETT v. LINDSAY et al
as 2:2013cv02874
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ALI GARRETT
Defendant:
CAMERON LINDSAY, FELTON, ATKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. CHRISTIAN EDUCATION CENTER C.E.C. et al
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
BRIAN DRUMMELL COOPER
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN EDUCATION CENTER C.E.C., PHILLIPS, NATALIE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. WOLF et al
as 3:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH RICKY JACKSON
Defendant:
JONATHON WOLF, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCGETTIGAN et al
as 2:2007cv01893
Plaintiff:
CORBIN THOMAS
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCGETTIGAN, PATRICK MEEHAN, ROBERT REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
