Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Steven Floyd Voss v. Isidaro Baca et al
as 3:2014cv00066
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Greg Cox, William Humphrey and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Floyd Voss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Nevens et al
as 3:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Liggett, Georgia Luce, Jennifer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely v. Walsh et al
as 3:2013cv00152
Defendant:
M. McBroom, M. Navarro and Lisa Walsh
Plaintiff:
Edward E. Seely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunditt v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 3:2011cv00424
Defendant:
AAB, Ambridge, SQT Caretree and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Cunditt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forsythe v. Lippis et al
as 2:2011cv00498
Defendant:
Dianne Dickson, Jackie Glass, Thom Gover and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Forsythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Navarro et al
as 2:2010cv02141
Plaintiff:
Eric Griffin
Defendant:
Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt, Robert Johnston and Gloria M. Navarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NOT USED
as 3:2009cv00546
Petitioner:
Fernando Navarro Hernandez
Respondent:
E.K. MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOT USED.
as 3:2009cv00548
Petitioner:
Fernando Navarro Hernandez
Respondent:
E.K. MCDANIEL and Catherine Cortez Masto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NOT USED
as 3:2009cv00547
Plaintiff:
Fernando Navarro Hernandez
Respondent:
E.K. MCDANIEL and Catherine Cortez Masto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. MCDANIEL et al
as 3:2009cv00545
Petitioner:
Fernando Navarro Hernandez
Respondent:
E.K. MCDANIEL and Catherine Cortez Masto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
