Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Gibson v. Regan
as 5:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 3:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, F C I Oakdale, Warden Marteneiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Regan
as 3:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Cornelius Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Stalsby et al
as 2:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Otis R Mays
Defendant:
SIS Officer Stalsby, James Kirkland, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Orleans Parish Criminal Court et al
as 3:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Orleans Parish Criminal Court and Unknown Buckley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abbott v. Otis-Sanders et al
as 2:2022cv01271
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
Loretia Otis-Sanders, Shelley Power, Shelia Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abbott v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 2:2021cv03774
Plaintiff:
William R Abbott
Defendant:
U S Bureau of Prisons, Shelly Power, Loretta Otis-Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bedwell v. Landry et al
as 3:2021cv00079
Respondent:
Jason Kent and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Otis Bedwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
