Cases 11 - 20 of 143
Carter v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01190
Petitioner:
Ladale Carter
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fenderson v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2023cv01146
Petitioner:
Tereze L Fenderson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Doe 600 et al v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2023cv00445
Petitioner:
Doe 600 and Circle R Ranch
Respondent:
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Pekin, Illinois Federal Corrections Institute, Warden Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Joseph Whipps v. K. Bennett
as 23-1289
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN WHIPPS
Respondent / Appellee:
K. BENNETT, Warden, FCI Pekin
Gordon v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01469
Petitioner:
Alxleotold Gordon
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whipps v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01456
Petitioner:
Joseph John Whipps
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Butler v. Warden FCI-Pekin
as 1:2022cv01422
Petitioner:
Keon Butler
Respondent:
Warden FCI-Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ellison v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01399
Plaintiff:
Dionte Ellison
Defendant:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01397
Petitioner:
Mario Taylor
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kean v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01391
Petitioner:
Thomas Kean
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
