Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Wilson v. Wright et al
as 2:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Bernard D. Wilson
Defendant:
S. Wright, Novak, Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Troy Wagner
Defendant:
Kanisha Peterson, Dakota Cardenas, Mark Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YAWN v. PALMER et al
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUBREU YAWN and ANTHONY AUBREY YAWN
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, MALLOY, LAURA PETERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. CLIPFORD et al
as 5:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
FELIX RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CLIPFORD, RICKY DIXON, SCOTT MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Sapp et al
as 3:2022cv00625
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Lt. Sapp, Sgt. or Off. Pittman, Sgt. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv20738
Plaintiff:
Damon Peterson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Bryant Keith Williams
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Major Crawford, Assistant Warden Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2021cv00223
Plaintiff:
TAWONE PETERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv14398
Plaintiff:
Ernest Kennedy Peterson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
