Cases 11 - 20 of 41
BOWMAN v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2021cv02860
Respondent:
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 1, MADELINE QUINN and others
Petitioner:
MELVIN BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARK WAHL, LORIE EASON and CRAIG MCEWEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2020cv04413
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER CONNOR COUNCIL, MR. SHELBY, EASON and others
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM HARRIS and SHAHEED KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPADA v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT RICCI, FRANK QUINN, CAPTAIN FUNKHOUSER and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SPADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
KELLY v. PA DOC et al
as 3:2020cv00143
Defendant:
MS. QUINN, UNIT MANAGER CONNOR COUNCIL, MR. SHELBY and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHEED KELLY and HAKEEM HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Carey v. Weaver et al
as 4:2020cv00929
Defendant:
C Weaver, Unknown Tutino, J Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MACK-TANSMORE v. MR. JONES et al
as 2:2020cv00689
Defendant:
S.P. GREEN, MR. JONES, MS. QUINN and others
Plaintiff:
HASHEAM MACK-TANSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2019cv05824
Respondent:
RN, FORMER CHCA SHIRLEY LAWS-SMITH, PA-C JOHN NICHOLSON, MD BENJAMIN V. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
SAMIRRAH MINNIS, MANDEE QUINN, MARK WAHL and others
Plaintiff:
TYREEK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GILLMORE v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2019cv05571
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL GILLMORE
Defendant:
MARIROSA LAMAS, B. ADAMS, M. QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLOVER v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2018cv00629
Plaintiff:
QUINN GLOVER
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ORLANDO HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Tritt et al
as 3:2018cv00632
Plaintiff:
Phillip Quinn
Defendant:
Brenda L. Tritt , Kathy Brittain , Joseph Sankus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
