Cases 11 - 20 of 1,248
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, J. Bateman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bahoujabour v. Lindsey et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Plaintiff:
Chouaib Bahoujabour
Defendant:
Captain Lindsey, Arlington County Detention Center, Sergeant S. Popal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Owens
as 7:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Jahkeem Wesley Jones
Defendant:
R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Helton et al
as 7:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Kayla Helton, Nurse A. Grizzle, Nurse G. Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00302
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Owens et al
as 7:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Smith
Defendant:
R. Owens, B. Dotson, T. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. RNCC Mailroom Personnel et al
as 7:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant:
RNCC Mailroom Personnel, R. Hickman, D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
James R Wood
Defendant:
Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
