Cases 11 - 20 of 118
McNeal v. White et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal
Defendant:
Natalie White and Steve Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Gibson et al
as 7:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
James E Sanders
Defendant:
Kristen Gibson, Ingrid Y. Ward, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. TDCJ et al
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Parren Smith
Defendant:
TDCJ, TBCJ, J Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Artie Joseph Riley, Jr.
Respondent:
TDCJ-CID Director and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nall v. Lofton et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Nall
Defendant:
Cynthia Lofton, Assist. Warden FNU Akwitti, Michael Alsobrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Stephen Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Collier et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Reuben Reed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Oscar Mendoza, Jessica Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. Schaap et al
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal
Defendant:
Dan L Schaap, Tripp Jones, Steve Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Batastini et al
as 6:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gray
Defendant:
Ashley B Batastini, FNU Madrano, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
