Cases 11 - 20 of 60
ORR v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER, JACK HENDRIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWERS v. RILEY et al
as 3:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
MARK ALLEN POWERS
Defendant:
STEPHANIE RILEY, MONICA GIBSON, CHRISTINA REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01442
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK ALLEN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICE LLC, MARK SEVIER, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bean v. Marthakis et al
as 3:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bean
Defendant:
Nancy Marthakis, Diane Thews, Kimberly Pflughaupt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. BAGIENSKI et al
as 1:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
QUANARDEL WELLS
Defendant:
MISSY BAGIENSKI, LISA HAMBLEN, MERSHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. REAGLE
as 1:2022cv02001
Petitioner:
KEVIN DEREK RILEY
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DENT v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DENT
Defendant:
SAMUEL JONATHAN BYRD, A. RILEY, S. FISCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOOTE v. SCHALK et al
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
GEORGE A. FOOTE, Jr.
Defendant:
DAVID SCHALK, ERIK ALLEN, PATRICIA RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RILEY v. NOWAKOWSKI
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
DEXTER L. RILEY
Defendant:
BONNIE NOWAKOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANTON v. LITTLEJOHN et al
as 3:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
ZACHARIAH C.J. BLANTON
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DAN MITCHELL, NATHAN LAGENOUR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
