Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Frazier v. Sgt. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Quamil Jahar Frazier
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Dfc. Robinson and Dfc. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Giddings v. Centurion Behavioral Health Staff et al
as 1:2022cv02516
Plaintiff:
Warren Giddings
Defendant:
Centurion Behavioral Health Staff, MD Dept. of Health Board of Prof Counselors and Therapists Staff, JCI Psychology Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Robinson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
David Robinson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2022cv00555
Petitioner:
David Anthony Robinson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Robinson v. Bivens et al
as 1:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robinson
Defendant:
C. Bivens, Dr. Choudry, M.D. and P.A. Crystal Jamison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Warden
as 1:2021cv02544
Plaintiff:
Tommy Robinson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson v. State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Petitioner:
Mack M. Robinson
Respondent:
State Of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. State of Maryland
as 1:2021cv01730
Petitioner:
Mack M. Robinson
Respondent:
State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
