Cases 11 - 20 of 50
James Calhoun-El v. Roderick Sower
as 13-6307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. CALHOUN-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK R. SOWER, Director of Correction, BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden and NANCY KOPP, Treasurer
Calhoun-El v. Sower et al
as 1:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
James Calhoun-El
Defendant:
Roderick R. Sower, Bobby P. Shearin and Nancy R. Kopp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sowers
as 1:2012cv03635
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Brown
Defendant:
Roderick R. Sowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archie Holland-El v. Gary Maynard
as 12-7428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARCHIE HOLLAND-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, SIPES, Hearing Officer, K. HILL-PEAY and others
Wells v. Kopp et al
as 1:2012cv02319
Defendant:
Nancy K. Kopp, Gary D. Maynard, Roderick R. Sower and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony K. Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland-El v. Maynard et al
as 1:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
Archie Holland-El
Defendant:
Gary D. Maynard, Sipes, Karla M. Hill-Peay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benord Burrell v. Roderick Sower
as 12-6444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENORD ANGELO BURRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden, et al, GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S., J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner of Correction and others
Mario Sibug v. Roderick Sower
as 12-6065
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO S. SIBUG
Respondent - Appellee:
RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden and DOUGLAS F. GANSLER, Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Sibug v. Sowers et al
as 1:2011cv02068
Petitioner:
Mario S. Sibug
Respondent:
Roderick R. Sowers and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Billy Asemani v. Gary Maynard
as 11-6670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILLY G. ASEMANI
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary, DPSCS, RODERICK R. SOWERS, Warden and R. DOVEY, Assistant Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
