Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Thais v. Rustin et al
as 1:2014cv00083
Plaintiff: Joshua A Thais
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littles v. Rustin et al
as 1:2014cv00068
Plaintiff: Donald R Littles
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Rustin et al
as 1:2014cv00044
Plaintiff: Mark A. Ortiz
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Rustin et al
as 1:2014cv00045
Plaintiff: Lee K. Owens
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Rustin et al
as 1:2013cv01244
Plaintiff: Valentino Harris
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benavidez v. Rustin et al
as 1:2013cv01229
Plaintiff: Ernesto Benavidez
Defendant: Ramon C. Rustin, Tom Zdunek and Thomas E Swisstack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEIL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00348
Plaintiff: RACHEL NEIL
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JOHN DOE, RAMON C. RUSTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01761
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: ALLEGHENY COUNTY , RAMON C. RUSTIN , JOHN JOHNSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. RUSTIN
as 2:2009cv01358
Petitioner: ROBERT B. EDWARDS
Respondent: RAMON C. RUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
DILAURI v. MULLEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00198
Plaintiff: RICHARD DILAURI
Defendant: WILLIAM P. MULLEN and RAMON C. RUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?