Cases 11 - 20 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Lyons v. Woods et al
as 5:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
James E Lyons
Defendant:
Billy Woods, Anna Marie Macafee, Alisha Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos-Ramos v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv24084
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Ramos-Ramos
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Carvajal and Warden Serrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Joseph v. Ramos et al
as 2:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Kacy Joseph
Defendant:
Ramos and Cannistraci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELC v. RAMOS et al
as 5:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
DAN I BELC
Defendant:
WOOD, TREVOR RAMOS and GLENN KIMBREL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bowden v. Frost et al
as 2:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Bowden
Defendant:
M. Frost, E. Ramos, A. Cassner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lisee et al
as 8:2022cv02532
Plaintiff:
Renard E. Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Lisee, Sgt. Rassdale, Sgt. Mardenardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Frost et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Bowden
Defendant:
M. Frost, E. Ramos, A. Cassner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Panameno-Ramos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00504
Petitioner:
Prudencio Panameno-Ramos
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
