Cases 11 - 20 of 8,195
Rodriguez v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rodriguez
Defendant:
FNU Stevenson, FNU Brown and FNU Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Wexford Medical Department et al
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Department, Alisha Tafoya, Cary Maciel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, William Tong, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv22130
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Neri v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01378
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez Neri
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRUZ v. DONDON et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
DONDON, M WILLIAMS, SHEREA GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11781
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
L. RODRIGUEZ and MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Pena v. Czeremcha et al
as 3:2024cv00938
Plaintiff:
James Pena
Defendant:
Czeremcha, Nick Rodriguez, Zack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Dumond v. L. Rodriguez, et al
as 24-11778
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant:
L. RODRIGUEZ, Miami Dade Police Officer, being sued in official and individual capacities and MIAMI DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
