Cases 11 - 20 of 202
Owens v. Rogers (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Almendarious Owens
Defendant:
Marcus Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hershiser v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Jack Dennison Hershiser
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Elmore Correctional Facility, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Roger Jay Jones, II
Defendant:
Courtney B. Rogers and Officer Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ms. Cooper et al
as 5:2022cv01239
Plaintiff:
Martel Robinson
Defendant:
Ms. Cooper, K Cash, Ms. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Gwathney et al
as 5:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Stovall
Defendant:
Leigh Gwathney, Darryl Littleton, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Cohen (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chapman Rogers Mays
Defendant:
Alan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moseley v. Butler
as 1:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Roger Alan Moseley
Respondent:
Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newburn v. Scully
as 1:2021cv00546
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Newburn
Defendant:
Judge Scully
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Rogers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00782
Plaintiff:
Antonio Williams and Antonio R. Williams
Defendant:
Morris Rogers, Sgt. Green, Officer Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. Godwin
as 1:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin and Adeeb Omar Osama Laiden
Defendant:
Charles O'Neal Godwin and Neal Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
