Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Williams v. Hartsell et al
as 2:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Timothy Huntley Williams
Defendant:
Roger Hartsell, Jay Rock, Unknown Spires and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dannels et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Roger Delane Wilson
Defendant:
Mark J Dannels, Cochise County Jail, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Ashley Winters
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Unknown Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00241
Petitioner:
Roger Bates
Respondent:
Unknown Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Meraz v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alex Meraz
Defendant:
Roger A Nelson, Mary E White, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Stangl et al
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Ramori Vaughn Rogers, Sr.
Defendant:
Amanda Stangl, Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Preayer v. Shinn, et al
as 2:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Roger Wayne Preayer
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riester v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00118
Petitioner:
Roger Perry Riester
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrep v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00053
Petitioner:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Godwin v. Berger et al
as 4:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin and Adeeb Osama Laden
Defendant:
Gregory Berger, Christina Woehr, Thomas E Higgins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
