Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Vidal v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2022cv00872
Petitioner:
Dennis Vidal
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin, Child Protection Services, Brenda Lee Barthoimew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Simms et al v. Dobson et al
as 2:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jesus M Simms, Tommy T Bush, Morningstar Thomas and others
Defendant:
Inspector Dobson, Earnell Lucas, David Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staszak, Marcin v. Schliesman, Michael et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Marcin Staszak
Defendant:
Deputy Michael Schliesman, Deputy Jessica Rodenkirch, Deputy Katherine Kregman and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Manthei et al
as 2:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rogers
Defendant:
Christopher Manthei, Warden Foster, Tonia Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner-Harris v. Revels et al
as 2:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Kenneath Turner-Harris
Defendant:
Randal Revels, Stacey Polk, Lt Michael Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. McDermott et al
as 2:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Roger Edwards
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott and Julie Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards, Roger v. McDermott, Jennifer et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Roger Edwards
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer McDermott and Julie Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockridge v. Hepp et al
as 2:2021cv00558
Defendant:
Dr Charles Larson, Roger Nurse Krantz, Warden Randy Hepp and others
Plaintiff:
James Lockridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeRosch, Matthew v. Tegels, Lizzie et al
as 3:2020cv01103
Defendant:
Roger Burke, Melinda Maasen, Lily Liu and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew DeRosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. King
as 2:2020cv00133
Petitioner:
Quentin Rogers
Respondent:
Tejuana King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
