Cases 11 - 20 of 486
Courtland Romeo v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-2373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTLAND D. ROMEO
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Miller v. Keast et al
as 3:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Micheal Miller
Defendant:
John Keast, Halki, Jessica Rambur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salinas v. Ramirez et al;
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Salinas
Defendant:
Romeo R Ramirez, Araseli B Lichtenberger and Baldemar Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salinas v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Roberto J. Salinas
Defendant:
Kimberly Perez, Romeo R Ramirez, Duval County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deluca v. Chief Health Officer
as 2:2023cv14165
Plaintiff:
Romeo Alfred Deluca
Defendant:
Chief Health Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Ruiz v. NDOC, et al
as 23-15781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS RUIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROMEO ARANAS, KIM ADAMSON and others
Deluca v. Resilard
as 2:2023cv14128
Plaintiff:
Romeo A. Deluca
Defendant:
Y. Resilard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Rangel et al
as 2:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Willie Church
Defendant:
Lt. Romeo Rangel, Lt. Aaron Cavazos and Sven Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Rangel et al
as 5:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Willie Church
Defendant:
Lt. Romeo Rangel, Lt. Aaron Cavazos and Lt. Sven Strack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert LeClair v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15334
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT LECLAIR
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES DZURENDA, MICHAEL MINEV, DR. MARTIN NAUGHTON and others
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS and HAROLD WICKHAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
