Cases 11 - 20 of 445
Winding v. King
as 22-60053
Petitioner / Appellant:
James C. Winding
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Ronald King
Cruse Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andrew c. Cruse Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Cheif Medical Director Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
CID, Unknown William, Burl Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Defendant:
CID of Greene County, Unknown William, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Burl Cain, Unknown Woodall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Dr. Woodall, Burl Cain, Tate Reese and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Morgan et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Robinson, MS Department of Corrections, Warden W. K. Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis, Sr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. King et al
as 3:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Warden W. K. Banks, Superintendent Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Cain et al
as 1:2021cv00013
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
CID, Burl Cain, Austin William and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. King
as 3:2020cv00287
Petitioner:
Dillion Williams
Respondent:
Ronald King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
