Cases 11 - 20 of 34
CASON v. DAVIS
as 2:2018cv09540
Petitioner:
KAMILA CASON
Respondent:
SARAH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FREEMAN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv08269
Petitioner:
KARLA FREEMAN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SARAH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOX v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv05860
Petitioner:
MIASHARI FOX
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SARAH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD et al
as 3:2018cv03752
Plaintiff:
GOLDA HARRIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY PAROLE BOARD, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SARAH DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGUIRE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2018cv03411
Petitioner:
MELANIE MCGUIRE
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and SARAH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WHITE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2018cv02453
Petitioner:
NATASHA WHITE
Respondent:
SARAH DAVIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2017cv13624
Plaintiff:
GOLDA HARRIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SARAH DAVIS, ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDALL v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2017cv12909
Petitioner:
MONIQUE KENDALL
Respondent:
SARAH DAVIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLADGER v. YATES et al
as 2:2017cv02821
Plaintiff:
CHAPPELL TYRONE FLADGER
Defendant:
SHERRY YATES, M. RIDGEWAY, E. STEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3693
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
