Cases 11 - 20 of 310
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Senty-Haugen v. Jesson et al
as 0:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Jesson et al
as 0:2022cv03059
Plaintiff:
Brandon Keith Benson
Defendant:
Lucinda Jesson, Nancy Johnston, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faul v. Lejeune
as 0:2022cv02993
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Michel Lejeune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2022cv02854
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Merrick Garland and Colett S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Lindlbauer et al
as 0:2022cv02011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Adam Brooks
Defendant:
David A. Lindlbauer, Jana Brister-Korby, Charles S. Fai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flynn v. USA
as 0:2022cv01690
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Flynn v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01265
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flynn v. Warden, FPC Duluth
as 0:2022cv00975
Petitioner:
Scott Phillip Flynn
Respondent:
Warden, FPC Duluth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. USA
as 0:2022cv01310
Petitioner:
Clyde Scott Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
